|
 |
     
        Teen models, nude models, bikini models, sexy models, thongs, thong models 
Please do NOT insert your country code!
All models are at least 18 years of age Terms & Conditions | Customer Service | EpochEU Support | CCBill Support | Site Map | Site Map XML Porn Queen Poses as Bondage Model. PETA? - Now this is a strange one... We all know PETA loves undressing women – the more famous, the better - and along the years, we've had to thank them for bringing quite a lot of smokin' hot semi-naked celebrities on their anti-fur poster ads. Pammy Anderson, Alicia Silverstone, Ditta von Teese, Holly Madison, Sadie Frost – there are just a few of the ladies who had no trouble at all flashing their most prized assents in order to convince us all to stop wearing fur. And while I personally have some doubts about PETA as an organization, I won't be getting into the "serious" part of the matter for now, simply because this is an entertainment section and you all come here to relax... and feast your eyes on a few well-chosen ladies who take off their clothes on principle. Kidding. Well, half-kidding anyway. The trouble is, this time around, PETA has either screwed up and made a very bad decision, or simply got its priorities wrong and made a terrible confusion. Otherwise I can't explain why anyone in their right minds would use former porn queen and one of the world's classiest ladies of all times, Jenna Jameson, to dissuade people from buying or using leather. I may be getting things mixed up here a bit – but what kind of humanitarian message could someone like Jenna send? Not that any of us could possibly forget that, but Jenna was a porn actress – which means she used to have sex on camera, you know, for money - and her movies featured plenty of fur rugs, fur-lined underwear, leather belts, strap-ons and other leather-made devices that would probably put even a respectable fashion designer to shame. Or at least that's what I heard, never having seen any of her movies myself, you know. Except maybe once for purely research purposes. Yeah... In any case, Jenna Jameson stripped to her underwear for this ad, and I admit I'm not particularly impressed with it. Thanks to good lighting, photoshop and more photoshop, we can't actually see her scarred boobs and she almost looks like a human being and not like the skeleton / duck mutant hybrid we all know she is. But still, why use a porn actress to dissuade people from using leather? If anything, they may become intrigued with her ad and decide they need a quick reminder of Jenna's... ahem, past exploits. And we all know where that will land us all. So, what do you think about Jenna's ad? Is the Betty Page pose convincing or just plain annoying? And in other news, Americas Next Top "Porn" Model ! Tyra Banks has advised her porn-star lookalike, Tyra Banxxx, to quit the business and find a more respectable job. But her campaign backfired. Banxxx just shot a new hard-core video that cheekily parodies Banks called "America's Next Top Porn Model," in which women compete by performing sex acts. Banxxx tells avn.com, "I love this business and I'm not going to leave it, and I'm not going to change my name." What makes this soo funny is that I recently got this porn as a gift a few weeks ago. It's pretty wack, I mean I watched it while eating dinner and trying to beat myself at Solitare on the computer. I'd advise Tyra Banxxx to join forces with Mr.Marcus, now that'd be a flick worth watching! Page 3 - Model Propaganda: The Sun, The Girls, The Truth. In the US, Rupert Murdoch's most effective propaganda tool is FOXNews. In the UK, it's a tabloid newspaper called The Sun with a daily circulation of about 3 million and change (more). Almost every day in The Sun, you can turn to Page 3 and see a picture of a topless woman. I know you're keen to hear more about that, but first, some background. In 1997, Murdoch's two UK newspapers – The Sun and The Times - backed Tony Blair’s "New Labour" and helped in no small part to bring them to power. Since then, with only a very occasional disagreement over immigration or Europe, The Sun has been helpfully feeding their readers the official government line on all manner of issues - up to and including the Iraq war. On 25 September 2002, they helped to sell the government's biggest lie, with a front-page headline declaring that Brits were "45 MINS FROM DOOM!" When Blair and his cabinet were finally questioned about misleading the public on the matter of WMDs, Defence Minister Geoff Hoon saved his arse by claiming that he had not seen this headline (prompted by information in the equally-dramatic dossier on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction). The Sun has backed almost every Bush initiative and played down every embarrassment. For example, when the images of torture in Abu Ghraib were front page news, The Sun buried it on page 6, with less than a 1/4 page, 130 words and a teeny-tiny picture. The next day, leading with George W. Bush's version of events, they used 229 words. And that was about it. (A week or so later, a Labrador puppy was thrown off an overpass and The Sun was there with a massive 3/4 page and 270 words. The poster for the ensuing campaign to catch the evildoers is still online if you wish to see it.) When George W. Bush invited himself to the UK for an unprecedented and very unpopular state visit, he gave only one interview - to The Sun. Yes, this most conservative of presidents - keen to wage a war on porn granted the exclusive to his most effective mouthpiece, tits or no tits. In Ye Olde Days, the topless models on Page 3 were accompanied by just enough insight and innuendo to allow the average reader to identify with the model and perhaps imagine they would be welcome to step into their lives and treat them to a 'playful' tweak of the nipples or a 'harmless' bongo session. Were the model training to be an accountant, the text would playfully refer to her "ample assets" and the "bottom line". Had she been a vet's assistant or even the owner of a small domestic animal, the caption would suggest that "She also brings the beast out in us, eh readers?".... and so on and so forth until you feared your sides would split. Under the new editor, Rebekah Wade, this changed. Pictures of Page 3 models were soon accompanied by a caption entitled "News in Briefs". This is funny for two entirely different reasons; because (haha) she's wearing briefs and because Murdoch's news outlets are notorious for blurring the line between news and editorial content. And what editorial content, ladies and gentleman! Those who have viewed FOXNews with a critical eye (and/or those who have watched the excellent documentary Outfoxed) will be aware of the important role graphics and supers play in selling core ideas. You also have to consider that The Sun once commissioned a reader survey that actually asked if the participant read the entire articles or just the headlines. Misleading headlines are often used in order to allow them to print the truth, while selling the lie. This is the way they operate. And with the new Page 3, they can deliver a highly focused and personalised editorial that sticks in the brain in a very personal and special way. Rebekah Wade has said in the past that the act of getting your breasts out for a few hundred quid in order to help shift 3 million units is empowering and liberating - she even went so far as to assert that; "Page Three girls are intelligent, vibrant young women who appear in The Sun out of choice and because they enjoy the job. Unsurprisingly, millions of our readers - men and women - enjoy looking at them." And who are we to argue with those figures, eh lads? For a newspaper that would never shy away from referring to cannabis as a 'gateway' drug, it seems odd that they would deny the connection between soft pornography and some of the harder stuff. Particularly when most of their more popular lasses are constantly approached to pose fully nude for high-end publications, and a disturbing number of their less-successful ones fall into the trap of appearing for full gynaecological studies in the seedier ones. An interesting name to track here is Rebekah Parmar Teasdale, who was left out in the cold (only after doing so many full nude spreads with hot girl-on-girl action that the issue could no longer be ignored) but invited to return because it was Wade's first day and they needed a Page 3 girl by the name of Rebekah for this hilarious debut. Bless. You should (hopefully) be aware that pornography is only an issue here as far as the charge of hypocrisy. The central issue is the exploitation of these women - and The Sun's readership - in a way that not even Orwell could have imagined in his wettest dream. |
|
|
||||||
